Lecture notes: Realism as tragedy

Narrative genres

This is my way of talking about IR theory

  • makes sense to me
  • but this is not the official story

Everything we try to talk about or explain —

  • our lives as autobiographies — the “national histories” of our countries
  • this is also true of international politics — a story of what happened
  • you should be able to understand stories told about international politics by means of literary theory

What unites all stories?

  • there is a beginning and an end — and something happens in between — a problem is solved — a conflict is resolved — some kind of logic is worked out
  • the story identifies a main protagonist — a hero — who has a certain character and plans
  • the story is moving forward through the actions in which the protagonist engages

”Plot structure” – can be characterized in terms of narrative genres

  • already classical authors write about this — Aristotle

Four different kinds of narrative genres:

  • tragedy
  • comedy
  • romance
  • irony or satire

That is —

  • there are four different, main stories, that can be told about international politics
  • four versions of the world described by means of four different plot structures

Which is the true story?

  • you can use the same facts, but tell the story very differently
  • they might all be true!

Tragedy

Classical Greek tragedy

  • not just “sad” or “unfortunate”
  • rather, a question of an ironclad logic — a prophecy that will come true no matter what we do
  • everything is determined by the gods — if you try to fight against it, you are only coming closer to your destiny
  • even if you know your destiny, there is nothing you can do about it

For example:

  • cf. Oedipus Rex — your destiny is to marry your mother
  • cf. Bacchae — the mother will kill her son

This is what’s tragic about it

  • the protagonists are helpless — the story is about how they are fighting against their destiny

The conclusion is just

  • the order of the world is confirmed — it is the gods, not human beings who decide
  • when your destiny is fulfilled, that happens which had to happen — there is no other way
  • the will of the god will always prevail

Realism

The tragic view …

  • human beings might want to try to improve the world, but it’s not possible — anarchy blocks any such attempts
  • anarchy — “there is no one to call”
  • all states will always think only of what’s best for them — they must always be ready to go to war — they cannot afford to trust others

As a result all other states must prepare for war

  • good intentions are not enough — it is the gods that decide, not us
  • if we try something else, we are just coming closer to our destiny, our doom
  • we have to arm ourselves, defend ourselves, look after ourselves

“Realism”

  • this is the most commonly used name for this “school”
  • Realpolitik — a German, 19th century, development
  • connected to power politics, security policy, balance of power politics

Reason of state – raison d’etat – raggione di stato

  • way of thinking already in the Renaissance
  • the state has its own reason, its own morality —
  • not the same kind of morality that applies to individuals — not individual morality

Individuals should not lie or kill —

  • but political leaders may do it — in fact they may have to do it —
  • not because they are bad people, or stupid, but because they are good — they have no other choice
  • they have to guarantee the security of the state — and of their citizens
  • cf. Obama and the drones — he is not a bad person, he is just following raison d’etat

Very macho — very male — all about wars and big guns

  • that sort of bravado that comes from “seeing things without illusions” —
  • attitude 20 year old boys adopt in order to shock their mothers …

Neorealism

  • Kenneth Waltz — structural features of the system
  • security is the goal and power is only the means

Mearsheimer — great power rivalry

  • study the system like we study other systems — the economic system
  • cf. the difference between international politics and foreign policy

Key concepts

Autonomy of politics

The point we just made …

  • politics has its own logic
  • just as the economy, morality, religion, etc distinctive form of morality —

Prudence — consider the consequences

  • always just the lesser evil — prioritizes security, order — not justice

Anarchy

  • we live in a world of states – no overarching authority
  • constant state of fear — imposing fear on others
  • “there is no one to call”

“National interest”

  • presupposes a united agency — a unified state
  • cf. the state as “body” with the king as a “head”
  • national interests as objective

Geopolitics

  • read the interests off the map

What is “power”?

  • we somehow know what it is, but at the same time difficult to measure —
  • many dimensions — forcing someone by means of threats

“Soft power”

  • by means of persuasion
  • popularity
  • the US in 1945
  • the power of Turkish soap operas

Lukes and his three faces of power

  • physical coercion
  • determining someone’s agenda
  • changing their goals and preferences

The powerlessness of power

  • US as the most powerful country in the world
  • how little weapons can accomplish
  • cf. US losses in wars in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan

Security dilemma

unavoidable since we all live in an anarchy

  • the more we arm ourselves, the more insecure we will become
  • but not arming ourselves is worse

constant arms races

Balance of power

Alliances

  • this is the Realist’s best hope for peace

Deterrence

  • we talked about already
  • nükleer caydırıcılık

Historical case studies

  • to prove that this is an eternal law of politics — this is how IR always has worked
  • but this is surely quite problematic

Thucydides

  • “the strong do what they will and the weak will suffer what they must”

Realism as “advice to princes”

  • mirrors of princes and all that — in the 1500s, when the international system first is developed
  • secret teaching — Machiavelli — everyone pretended to be horrified
  • this is simply what you have to do to stay in power

Thomas Hobbes

What is he actually saying in chapter 13 of Leviathan?

Realism as a European tradition

  • the 18th century as the period of “balance of power”
  • teaching foreign ministers

America as different

  • corrupt European practices
  • we can start again
  • we have no enemies — except the “Indians” …

The US as isolated from the world cf. “the American way of war”

  • little need for IR theory
  • changes after World War I — but Americans pull back — we talked about this already …

Context of the Cold War

  • Niebuhr — Hertz — Kissinger
  • influenced by historical studies
  • moral issue — how human beings are — our “fallen nature”wisdom of statesmen — practical knowledge, not science — international politics is something that you do
  • practices — judicial judgement

Mutually Assured Deterrence (MAD)

  • explain how this was supposed to work …

The whole movie is here

Other cases of competitive systems

Sunzi and the Legalists in China

Arthahastra in India

Collective action problems

  • Mancur Olson and all that …
  • Why do people vote?
  • or if we organize a party …

Prisoner’s dilemma

Game of Chicken

The situation in Haiti

Questions

  1. What can you tell us about the history of Haiti?
  2. Who were Jean-Claude Duvalier? Who was “Baby Doc”?
  3. How and why was President Jovenel Moïse killed?
  4. Who is “Barbecue”?
  5. Why did President Ariel Henry fly to Kenya?
  6. Why did